The Supreme Court has given a major decision on the re-examination of the murder of the Father of the Nation, Mahatma Gandhi.
Following the Supreme Court order, lawyer Amarinder Saran who has examined all the necessary documents has informed the court. He told that there is no proof of the existence of anyone other than Nathuram Godse in killing Bapu.
He informed the court that there is no evidence that the matter for the bullet theory is there. Explain that Pankaj was an FDN theory that Gandhi was killed by four bullets.
Let us tell you that the Supreme Court appointed former Additional Solicitor General and senior lawyer Amaranth Sharan as a Judicial Magistrate in this case. In this petition, the question was raised with the question mark on the story of 'Three bullets' in the Gandhi assassination, whether a person other than Nathuram Godse had also filed the fourth bullet?
In this massacre, the court sentenced Godse and Apte to death on February 10, 1949. At the same time, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar was given the benefit of doubt due to lack of evidence. After the confirmation of the death sentence of Godse and Apte on June 21, 1949, by the East Punjab High Court, both were hanged in Ambala jail on November 15, 1949.
Was there any other killer of Mahatma Gandhi? By the way, the police rely on this story that three bullets had been run on Gandhi, but was there a fourth bullet, which other than Nathuram Godse did? A number of such questions were heard on a petition filed in the Supreme Court on October 6.
No comments:
Post a Comment